Publications : Monographs List of Articles & Authors
The American Board of Vocational
Experts Monograph Series
The American Board of Vocational Experts (ABVE)
remains the premier professional body focusing upon educational needs and certification
requirements for those professionals involved in providing information pertaining to
vocational assessments, labor market access, analyses, opinions, and testimonies in civil
and administrative proceedings. In the Monograph Series and Journal Abstracts, attempts
are made to offer a wide range of presentations to articulate, familiarize, and educate
ABVE members, and other interested parties, to the role and practical application of the
multidisciplinary nature of vocational assessment in a forensic setting.
The various Monograph series and copies of select
articles are available through ABVE at various costs. Please contact ABVE at:
abve@abve.net
Monograph # 1
The Vocational Experts Testimony
Editor
Ronald A. Peterson, Ph.D.
The first of a series of ABVE monographs, the
following articles address the vocational experts role as an expert witness in a
myriad of settings; i.e., (1) basic roles of the expert witness in the courtroom; (2)
expert witnesses and workmans compensation; (3) vocational experts and the
industrial commission; (4) vocational experts and social security; (5) vocational experts
in forensic rehabilitation; (6) expert testimony and hedonics.
(1) Rogers, R. [Judge of the U.S. District Court, Topeka, KS]
(1991). Role of the Expert Witness. pp. 1-25.
Summary: Presented by Judge Rogers of the U.S. District
Court, Topeka, Kansas, this article explores the role of the expert witness from a
judicial viewpoint based on legal research and court observations. Offerings include some
"dos" and "donts," and provide guidance from actual court
answers that either scored or failed. Included are legal statements of the roles of
vocational expert witnesses, (i.e., the Federal Rules of Evidence that are generally
followed in all states, procedure at trial, exclusion of witnesses, witness courtroom
appearance, tips for the expert witness, and specifics related to vocational testimony).
(2) Halas, A. (1991). The Vocational Expert &
Workmans Compensation. pp. 26-37.
Summary. This article presents a review of the expert
witness in the courtroom with a focus on the vocational expert and hints at the rule of
such expert testimony in workers compensation proceedings. The very nature of
workmans compensation, even without litigation, requires the role of the vocational
expert in one of his/her over-lapping guises: vocational expert, rehabilitation counselor
,or labor market analyst. In workers compensation litigation, vocational testimony
and opinion evidence elaborates on, and translates expert medical opinion, relative to
physiological or emotional limitations, attributable to a certain injury, into
suitable and available job positions in an appropriate labor
market. The claimants are those individuals who are within the workers compensation
system, and are previously determined to have permanent medical impairment attributable to
industrial injury (injury during job performance). Within the litigious system of
workers compensation, the finder of fact is not a jury but the Administrative Law
Judge. Differentials of approach between the defense and claimants position, the
role of the vocational expert, and the extent to which labor market testimony is viable
are discussed.
(3) Howard, H. W. (1991). Vocational Experts and the Industrial Commission.
pp. 38-45.
Summary. Within this article, Administrative law Judge
(ALJ) Hal Howard, explores the differences between the use of vocational expert testimony
and a vocational expert appearing before a jury or ALJ. In appearances before ALJs, the
vocational experts testimony is required to be concise and brief. Judge Howard cites
important questions that are to be answered by the vocational expert and various laws and
principles involved in Arizonas litigation system but that are most likely
applicable in other jurisdictions.
(4) Melkonoff, R. A. (1991). Vocational Experts and Social
Security. pp. 46-56.
Summary. The focal point of this article is upon the
vocational experts role in Social Security hearings as related by an attorney who
has experience in Social Security proceedings. A summary of applicable disability
standards is presented along with considerations for the vocational experts criteria
of for determining a claimants ability to function in the labor market. Work
experience of the claimant is discussed as well as performance of alternative work,
exertional limitations, age, education, transferable skills, and inability to acquire
work.
(5) Butler, V. J. (1991). The Role of the Vocational
Expert in Forensic Rehabilitation: A Guide to Occupational Assessment. pp. 57
71.
Summary. Within this article, Dr. Veronica Butler
discusses the role of the vocational expert with an emphasis on loss of earning capacity
(LOEC) of an injured litigant or other individuals who have retained legal counsel in
matters wherein LOEC plays an appropriate role. Although various states may differ in
their format or particular data required, the critical variables of LOEC remain and are
explored. Medical and/or psychological documentation is considered along with a
claimants formal educational level of academic level, employment history, and
previous pre-injury employment background services. Labor surveys are also discussed.
(6) Magrowski, J. F. (1991). Future Vocational Expert
Testimony on Hedonics. pp. 72-80.
Summary. This presentation is a brief introductory article
on hedonics, that is a relatively new and controversial area of focus when determining
economic loss as a result of disability and injury. Since this publication, numerous
explanations and court cases have included this particular concept of economic loss.
Instances of the theory and use of hedonics and its use in the judicial system can be
found by a thorough search of the literature, case law and additional resources.
Monograph # 2
Professional Issues: Ethics, Methods and Roles of the Vocational
Expert
Editor
David B. Stein, Ph.D.
The American Board of Vocational Experts
offers a second in a series of monographs focusing upon the vocational experts
ethical roles and the milieu in which ethics and skills are practiced. This issue
addresses the (1) ethical methods and roles of the vocational expert; (2) ethical issues
for the vocational expert relative to minor head injury; (3) effective use of
rehabilitation and economic experts in personal injury; (4) the vocational experts
role in wage loss analysis; (5) forensic vocational evaluation; and (5) technology, the
work force, and people with disabilities within the labor force.
(1) Butler,V. (1994). Some Ethical Considerations for the Vocational Expert. pp.
11-15.
Summary. Some vocational experts might take exception and believe it ludicrous
to discuss ethical conduct as it relates to their everyday work activities. As it is, most
experts and professionals believe they are functioning with integrity and objectivity;
nevertheless, in competitive business, certain aspects of ethical conduct may be
"rationalized away." This particular paper address adherence to the practice of
professional ethics and the multidimensional consideration that it holds for vocational
experts.
(2) Hartlege, L. C. & Williams, B.L. (1994). Ethical Issues for the
Vocational. pp. 11-15.
Summary. This presentation attempts to address issues of minor head injury as a
common ethical dilemma faced by the vocational expert in the development of professional
opinion when all potentially vocationally limiting factors are not obvious, nor recognized
by treating medical personnel. Unlike a disabling head injury that may present as the
major diagnostic finding and focus of treatment, a minor head injury may go unnoticed by
all involved, including the victim. The vocational experts ethical burden focuses on
the attempt to consider all aspects that limit the actions of the client, and to incur the
burden of determining if, in fact, that mild head injury has occurred limiting ones
employment opportunities. There is always consideration that mild brain injury may be a
factor of vocational planning.
(3) Williams, J.M. & Reavy, G. (1994). Effective Use of
Rehabilitation and Economic Experts in Personal Injury Cases: An Integrated Approach.
pp. 16-27.
Summary. The roles of vocational and rehabilitationist specialists as expert
witnesses have become more prevalent in recent years. It is common for some attorneys to
fail to recognize the value of the vocational/rehabilitation experts testimony or
misunderstand the roles and responsibilities of these experts in civil and administrative
law proceedings. This situation tends to be particularly true when testimony of an
economist on future earning capacity is anticipated in the courtroom. The critical role of
the vocational expert is discussed.
(4) Toppino, D. & Boyd, D. (1994). Defining the Vocational
Experts Role in Wage Loss Analysis. pp. 28-37.
Summary. The successful presentation of injury litigation requires a team
approach, using medical vocational, economic and other specialists to outline the relevant
issues for the Court. The vocational expert, through his/her singular testimony, can offer
the jury the most complete assessment of all the damages sustained, based on the various
medical reports while also presenting an easily understandable idea of the implications
for the injury. This presentation addresses the role of the forensic vocational expert who
is in the best position to tie together important elements for the judge and jury.
(5) Feldbaum, C. L. (1994). Forensic Vocational Evaluation. pp.
38-50.
Summary. The expanding role of the vocational expert in personal injury
litigation and various administrative legal proceedings has been palpable. It is necessary
for both sides in a dispute to document the quantum aspect of their cases, i.e., the
extent of damages sustained. In recent years, many more attorneys are hiring vocational
expert witnesses. This discussion addresses key points about forensic vocational testing
and offers practical suggestions for the vocational expert . However, there is not the
intent to deal comprehensively with such a broad topic, but testing caveats are offered
and guidelines suggestions for selecting test batteries. Important factors impacting
testing, grade levels, test interpretations, constraints, and presentation of test results
is presented.
(6) Mayer, L. (1994). Technology, Work Force Participation and the
Disabled: Present Future Status. pp. 51-73.
Summary: The revolution of technology has been noted to be even more powerful
than that of the industrial revolution thereby threatening job opportunities. Information
technology coupled with robotics and other technological advances affect even the most
skilled blue-collar worker. Discussed are participants within the work force and major
changes that have occurred within the U.S. labor market over the past two decades.
Earnings, affirmative action and discrimination along with the an emphasis of the disabled
in the workforce are discussed. The future of work is discussed and the dilemmas and
scenarios of worker transformation for the future are presented.
Monograph # 3
Professional Issues: Assessment, Expert Testimony, and Catastrophic
Injury
Editor
Lindette L. Mayer, Ph.D.
This edition of the Monograph is the third in a
series representing the myriad focus of Vocational Experts. Specifically, three articles
reflect upon assessment in varied scenarios: (1) assessment of future earning capacity;
(2) quantification of wrongful dismissal, and (3) statistical determination of factors
influencing post-rehabilitation wage. Two additional articles indicate the diversity of VE
issues and focus upon expert testimony in (4) marital dissolution with a gender emphasis,
and (5) life care planing for catastrophic injury.
The Third Edition of the ABVE Monograph series exemplifies a
different format from previous editions, as it is completed in a quasi-professional
journal format.
(1) Cutler, F & Cutler, G. (1995). An Assessment of the Economic,
Physical, and Mental Health consequences of Wrongful Dismissal. pp. 1-15.
Summary. Wrongful dismissal from employment is an area of evaluation for those
who are asked to assess economic damages due to the consequences of such an action. This
article discusses assessment and considerations of techniques in the attempt to quantify
losses accrued as the result of wrongful dismissal.
(2) Williams, J.M. & Maze, M. (1995). Determining Future
Earning Capacity: Using Computerized Skills, Work Life, and Wage Data Provided in RAVE. pp.
16-25.
Summary. This article discusses the methodology used by the computerized
transferable skills and earning capacity assessment software, RAVE, in determining pre-and
post-event earning capacity. The factors to be considered in assessing earning capacity
and the ways to build a rationale for the vocational experts opinions using RAVE are
discussed. (Editors note: The American Board of Vocational Experts does not
endorse the use of any specific commercialized program.)
(3) Mayer, L. L. (1995) Effects of sources of Evaluative Data Upon Wage. pp.
16-41.
Summary: Since many of the previous research efforts in rehabilitation outcome
have focused upon the general outcome measures of successful and unsuccessful
rehabilitation of subjects engaged in rehabilitation programs, the purpose of this study
was to determine specific vocationally significant variables that are predictive of wage
outcome for a group of "status 26" rehabilitants (N=132) from the caseload files
of the State of Indianas Division of Aging, disability and Rehabilitation Services.
Two types of variables were included for predictive purposes. Twenty-five vocationally
significant variables were identified and investigated. In addition, six descriptive
variables inclusive of gender, race, disability type, age and years of pre-and post
rehabilitation education were investigated. A stepwise regression model was used in
determining those statistical correlations meeting the test of p= <.05 level of
significance between the independent variables and the criterion variable of wage.
Findings indicated that among the 25 vocational variables, reasoning, physical
strength, job location and atmospheric conditions satisfied the statistical test of
significance. Further significant correlations were found to exist with the descriptive
variables of gender, age and years of education. Coupled with these findings, descriptive
statistics and comparison were presented as part of the study.
(4) Murphy , P. A.. (1995). Vocational Expert Witness Testimony in Divorce:
Some Problematic Issues. pp. 42-52.
Summary. This essay discusses the utilization of expert witness testimony in the
divorce process. The author cites the legal use of Vocational Expert testimony and raises
questions involving the lack of substantive literature regarding women and the role of the
value of work. Issues are considered that are relevant in considering the vocational
experts testimony of female gender issues in the dissolution of marriage.
(5) Williams, J. M. & Burlew, L.D. (1995). Dealing with Catastrophic
Injury: A Developmental Perspective on Life Care Planning. pp. 53-59.
Summary. The role of the rehabilitationist in life care planning is discussed
with specific focus upon developmental tasks from young adulthood to older adulthood.
Specific elements during the process of rebuilding from disability are directed toward
pre-occupational self-concept and the emergence of a post-injury self-concept and self
acceptance. This is coupled with the necessity for rehablitationists to include
self-concept enhancing activities and services as a priority in developing a life care
plan.
|